One Soul, Many Bodies: A Case for Universal Compassion

In a world so preoccupied with differences—species, races, borders—we often forget the truth Hippocrates understood centuries ago: “The soul is the same in all living creatures although the body of each is different.” The image of a newborn baby and a baby primate, both responding to a stethoscope in near-identical ways, drives home the shared sensitivity and wonder between species. Strip away the surface, and what remains is consciousness, emotion, and a desire to live.

Modern science confirms what ancient wisdom already knew. Animals feel fear, joy, attachment, and pain. They form bonds, remember kindness, and mourn loss. To ignore their suffering simply because their bodies look different is not just unscientific—it’s morally bankrupt.

The soul, as Hippocrates described, isn’t defined by shape or skin. If we accept that all beings possess the same animating essence, then how can we justify harming them for food, fashion, entertainment, or convenience?

The measure of a society is not how it treats its powerful, but how it treats the voiceless. This image is a call to expand our circle of compassion, to recognize that empathy should not end at the edge of our own species. If the soul is shared, then so must be the right to live free from harm.

Share